All my sons chris and ann relationship goals

all my sons chris and ann relationship goals

Everything you ever wanted to know about Chris Keller in All My Sons, written by When Ann says yes to his proposal, Chris tells her he'll make her a fortune. It is usually played out in tones of grey, of going too far for some goal that would Arthur Miller, the playwright, once wrote: "The fortress that 'All My Sons' lays . Yet, she failed to nurture Chris by opposing his marriage to Ann. She was so. In my opinion, George will not succeed in achieving his goals in life. He blames the neighborhood for his lack of relationships with any of the Students are required to answer questions for either (B) All My Sons OR (C) The Wave. Kate believes that Ann isn't married because she is waiting for Larry to come back from .

Name two characters in this play who had made serious compromises. Were they the wrong thing to do? Jim Bayliss compromised by giving up his dream to be a research scientist to became a practicing physician and support his family. The play shows that he is pretty unhappy about it. Jim's dilemma is a common one for many adults. The right choice varies with each situation. Jim's wife had put him through medical school and he had obligations to her and to his children.

Chris compromised by coming into his father's business and burying his suspicions. This was clearly not the right thing to do. When he knew the truth and after taking his long drive, Chris agreed to compromise again by deciding not to report his father. However he retained a core of integrity by deciding to quit the family business and move away. This may have been a reasonable compromise but it left Chris feeling polluted and as if he had let his fellow soldiers down.

Certainly Arthur Miller doesn't like this compromise. Chris rejected it after he learned of Larry's letter and when his father appeared willing to go the District Attorney. Ann decided to compromise from the beginning of the play and again during the play as the revelations about Mr. Her compromise was to ally herself with the Keller family, and later the son of the man who had tried to throw all the blame on her father. This compromise is not criticised in the play and it was probably the right thing to do, especially after Chris had announced his decision to leave the family business and move away.

Chris wasn't responsible for what his father had done. The neighbors compromised their ethics by accepting Joe as a pillar of the community after his conviction was overturned. In the play, this is seen as a symptom of the cynicism of society. Under the law, people are innocent until proven guilty. However, respect in society is something different. Joe should not have been accepted as an upstanding member of the community. Did Ann make any compromises in this play?

Did she do the right thing? See response to preceding question. What kind of a relationship did Chris find among his fellow soldiers in battle and what did he find when he came home? This is how Chris describes it. They didn't die; they killed themselves for each other. I mean that exactly; a little more selfish and they'd 've been here today. And I got an idea -- watching them go down.

All My Sons: Character Profiles | Novelguide

Everything was being destroyed, see, but it seemed to me that one new thing was made. A kind of -- responsibility. And then I come home and it was incredible. I - there was no meaning in it here; the whole thing to them was a kind of a -- bus accident. I went to work with Dad, and that rat-race again. I felt -- what you said-- ashamed somehow. Because nobody was changed at all.

I felt wrong to be alive, to open the bank-book, to drive the new car, to see the new refrigerator. I mean you can take those things out of a war, but when you drive that car you've got to know that it came out of the love a man can have for a man, you've got to be a little better because of that. Otherwise what you have is really loot, and there's blood on it. I don't want to take any of it. And I guess that included you. Some people have seen this play as a tragedy.

All My Sons: Character Profiles

What is the difference between the structure of "All My Sons" and the structure of a classic Greek tragedy such as "Oedipus Rex"? The basic structure of a Greek tragedy is as follows: The main character does something that is contrary to the moral order of the universe. This is called the "main action".

Sometimes the protagonist doesn't even realize that he has done something wrong. Whatever the outcome, balance, harmony and moral order are restored, and the other characters are able to move on freely. There are several differences. First, in Ancient Greek tragedy, the protagonist is someone of stature like a king or a prince. Joe Keller is just a successful businessman.

Second, in Ancient Greek tragedy the community suffers until the hero learns from his fault or dies. In this play there is no economic consequence suffered by the community.

all my sons chris and ann relationship goals

Instead, it is the illness of cynicism that infects the neighbors. Third, there is no chorus in "All My Sons". Mother has some lines that remind us of a chorus, but Miller has clearly substantially modified this element. Is Joe Keller's suicide necessary to allow Chris to live free from guilt? There is no one correct answer to this question.

Here are some thoughts.

all my sons chris and ann relationship goals

Certainly, if asked, Chris would not have wanted his father to die. But from Joe's standpoint, as a man who wanted to do what was best for his son, was there any other way out? The answer is that there was. He could have accepted the fact that he had acted wrongfully and taken his punishment.

He could then have tried to find a way to atone for his crime and redeem himself. Keller had always been a coward, from the time he shipped the defective cylinders rather than face the ruin of his company, to the time he shifted all the blame onto Steve Deever, through to the end when he killed himself to avoid facing the consequences of admitting guilt.

But when Keller put the gun to his head he could very well have been thinking that this was a final sacrifice for his son. Keller was very good at self-deception.

all my sons chris and ann relationship goals

He could have been thinking that if he were out of the way, it would be easier for Chris to grieve the loss of his image of his father. Compare and contrast the characters of Oedipus Rex and Joe Keller. There are many interesting points to make in response to this question. This list is by no means exhaustive. Both Oedipus and Joe Keller commit crimes many years before the play opens and they are destroyed as a result.

His daughter Ann and son George have cut off all contact with him in disapproval of his supposed crime. When the play opens, however, George has recently visited Steve in prison and has become convinced of his true version of events. Chris is a major truth-teller in the play, and is supported in this role by Ann. It takes a certain talent … for lying. You have it, and I do. But Jim is convinced that Chris will end up compromising his standards, as most people do Act Three: We all come back ….

These private little revolutions always die. The compromise is always made. As it turns out, Chris has been compromising for years. He reveals in Act Three that he suspected all along that Joe was guilty of the crime.

all my sons chris and ann relationship goals

He is a prosperous businessman of nearly sixty years of age. He knowingly sent out faulty cylinder heads that resulted in the deaths of twenty-one pilots, and blamed the incident on his deputy manager, Steve Deever.

Steve was imprisoned, while Joe escaped censure by lying about his own part in the affair. Joe excuses his crime to himself with the conviction that he did everything for his family, which is his primary concern in life.

All My Sons - Answers to Discussion Questions

He has sacrificed everything, including his duty to society, in order to make money for his family. While he is good-natured, Joe lacks any breadth of depth of vision and sees little beyond his business and household.

Joe is not a bad man: As such, he stands as an everyman figure with whom the audience can identify. A poorly educated man who succeeded because he had a talent for making money, Joe can also be viewed as an embodiment of the American Dream the idea that in America, whatever your background in life, you can become wealthy and successful through hard work and an entrepreneurial spirit.

She knows the truth about the faulty cylinder heads incident, but supports Joe in his deception that he is innocent. Kate in turn is supported by Joe in her self-delusion that one day Larry will return. This is a possibility that Kate could not bear, and so she attempts to shut it out through her self-deception.