Lorentz lorenz relationship with god

Hendrik Lorentz - Wikipedia

lorentz lorenz relationship with god

Lorentz was correct and that Einstein's Theory of Relativity should correctly be termed The significance of this correction in its relation to the interaction of science and society . to have said that he " did not believe that God plays with dice. The derivation he presents of the "Lorentz- Lorenz relation" in deviates somewhat from his original version, though the final relation is the same. 1]/{NL[e* + 2]} = x/, () which is called the Clausius—Mosotti relation. V (n” – 1)/(n” + 2) = R, () which is called the Lorentz—Lorenz relation. apo is the resonance angular frequency of a single oscillator given by, K NLe” God.

His method involved empathizing with animals, often using anthropomorphization to imagine their mental states. He believed that animals were capable of experiencing many of the same emotions as humans. In his application for party membership he wrote, "I'm able to say that my whole scientific work is devoted to the ideas of the National Socialists.

Konrad Lorenz

His published writing during the Nazi period included support for Nazi ideas of " racial hygiene " couched in pseudoscientific metaphors. I was frightened—as I still am—by the thought that analogous genetical processes of deterioration may be at work with civilized humanity.

Moved by this fear, I did a very ill-advised thing soon after the Germans had invaded Austria: I wrote about the dangers of domestication and, in order to be understood, I couched my writing in the worst of nazi terminology.

I do not want to extenuate this action. I did, indeed, believe that some good might come of the new rulers. The precedent narrow-minded catholic regime in Austria induced better and more intelligent men than I was to cherish this naive hope. Practically all my friends and teachers did so, including my own father who certainly was a kindly and humane man.

None of us as much as suspected that the word "selection", when used by these rulers, meant murder. I regret those writings not so much for the undeniable discredit they reflect on my person as for their effect of hampering the future recognition of the dangers of domestication.

The university also accused him of using his work to spread "basic elements of the racist ideology of National Socialism". Contributions and legacy[ edit ] With Nikolaas Tinbergen leftLorenz has been called 'The father of ethology', by Niko Tinbergen.

Lorenz system - Wikipedia

They experimented with " supernormal stimuli " such as giant eggs or dummy bird beaks which they found could release the fixed action patterns more powerfully than the natural objects for which the behaviors were adapted. Influenced by the ideas of William McDougallLorenz developed this into a "psychohydraulic" model of the motivation of behavior, which tended towards group selectionist ideas, which were influential in the s. Another of his contributions to ethology is his work on imprinting.

His influence on a younger generation of ethologists ; and his popular works, were important in bringing ethology to the attention of the general public. Lorenz claimed that there was widespread contempt for the descriptive sciences. He attributed this to the denial of perception as the source of all scientific knowledge: Vision of the challenges facing humanity[ edit ] With Nikolaas Tinbergen rightLorenz predicted the relationship between market economics and the threat of ecological catastrophe.

All the advantages that man has gained from his ever-deepening understanding of the natural world that surrounds him, his technological, chemical and medical progress, all of which should seem to alleviate human suffering Fundamental to Lorenz's theory of ecology is the function of negative feedback mechanisms, which, in hierarchical fashion, dampen impulses that occur beneath a certain threshold. The thresholds themselves are the product of the interaction of contrasting mechanisms.

Thus pain and pleasure act as checks on each other: To gain a desired prey, a dog or wolf will do things that, in other contexts, they would shy away from: All these inhibitory mechanisms The organism cannot allow itself to pay a price which is not worth paying.

lorentz lorenz relationship with god

In nature, these mechanisms tend towards a 'stable state' among the living beings of an ecology: A closer examination shows that these beings It is obvious that the predator is strongly interested in the survival of that species, animal or vegetable, which constitutes its prey. It is not uncommon that the prey species derives specific benefits from its interaction with the predator species Lorenz states that humanity is the one species not bound by these mechanisms, being the only one that has defined its own environment: Positive feedback always involves the danger of an 'avalanche' effect For many animal species, environmental factors keep But there is no force which exercises this type of healthy regulatory effect on humanity's cultural development; unfortunately for itself, humanity has learned to overcome all those environmental forces which are external to itself p Regarding aggression in human beings, Lorenz states: Let us imagine that an absolutely unbiased investigator on another planet, perhaps on Mars, is examining human behavior on earth, with the aid of a telescope whose magnification is too small to enable him to discern individuals and follow their separate behavior, but large enough for him to observe occurrences such as migrations of peoples, wars, and similar great historical events.

He would never gain the impression that human behavior was dictated by intelligence, still less by responsible morality.

Clausius–Mossotti relation

If we suppose our extraneous observer to be a being of pure reason, devoid of instincts himself and unaware of the way in which all instincts in general and aggression in particular can miscarry, he would be at a complete loss how to explain history at all.

The position had initially been offered to Johan van der Waalsbut he accepted a position at the Universiteit van Amsterdam. After that, he extended his research to a much wider area while still focusing on theoretical physics. Lorentz made significant contributions to fields ranging from hydrodynamics to general relativity.

His most important contributions were in the area of electromagnetism, the electron theory, and relativity.

Lorentz-Lorenz relation - Knowino

When a colleague and former student of Lorentz's, Pieter Zeemandiscovered the Zeeman effect inLorentz supplied its theoretical interpretation.

The experimental and theoretical work was honored with the Nobel prize in physics in Lorentz' name is now associated with the Lorentz-Lorenz formula, the Lorentz forcethe Lorentzian distributionand the Lorentz transformation. Electrodynamics and relativity[ edit ] Main articles: Although Lorentz did not give a detailed interpretation of the physical significance of local time, with it, he could explain the aberration of light and the result of the Fizeau experiment.

Lorenz Equations via Worked Example

Inwith the attempt to explain the Michelson-Morley experimentLorentz also proposed that moving bodies contract in the direction of motion see length contraction ; George FitzGerald had already arrived at this conclusion in The paper clearly recognizes the significance of this formulation, namely that the outcomes of electrodynamic experiments do not depend on the relative motion of the reference frame.

The paper includes a detailed discussion of the increase of the inertial mass of rapidly moving objects in a useless attempt to make momentum look exactly like Newtonian momentum; it was also an attempt to explain the length contraction as the accumulation of "stuff" onto mass making it slow and contract. Lorentz and special relativity[ edit ] Albert Einstein and Hendrik Antoon Lorentz, photographed by Ehrenfest in front of his home in Leiden in InEinstein would use many of the concepts, mathematical tools and results Lorentz discussed to write his paper entitled " On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies ", [13] known today as the theory of special relativity.

Because Lorentz laid the fundamentals for the work by Einstein, this theory was originally called the Lorentz-Einstein theory. Lorentz published a series of papers dealing with what he called "Einstein's principle of relativity".

For instance, in[15][16] [17] It would be impossible to decide which of them moves or stands still with respect to the ether, and there would be no reason for preferring the times and lengths measured by the one to those determined by the other, nor for saying that either of them is in possession of the "true" times or the "true" lengths. This is a point which Einstein has laid particular stress on, in a theory in which he starts from what he calls the principle of relativity, [ His results concerning electromagnetic and optical phenomena By doing so, he may certainly take credit for making us see in the negative result of experiments like those of Michelson, Rayleigh and Brace, not a fortuitous compensation of opposing effects, but the manifestation of a general and fundamental principle.

Whereas I have not been able to obtain for the equations referred to moving axes exactly the same form as for those which apply to a stationary system, Einstein has accomplished this by means of a system of new variables slightly different from those which I have introduced.

Though Lorentz still maintained that there is an undetectable aether in which resting clocks indicate the "true time": Yet, I think, something may also be claimed in favour of the form in which I have presented the theory.

I cannot but regard the ether, which can be the seat of an electromagnetic field with its energy and its vibrations, as endowed with a certain degree of substantiality, however different it may be from all ordinary matter. Provided that there is an aether, then under all systems x, y, z, t, one is preferred by the fact, that the coordinate axes as well as the clocks are resting in the aether.

If one connects with this the idea which I would abandon only reluctantly that space and time are completely different things, and that there is a "true time" simultaneity thus would be independent of the location, in agreement with the circumstance that we can have the idea of infinitely great velocitiesthen it can be easily seen that this true time should be indicated by clocks at rest in the aether.

lorentz lorenz relationship with god

However, if the relativity principle had general validity in nature, one wouldn't be in the position to determine, whether the reference system just used is the preferred one. Then one comes to the same results, as if one following Einstein and Minkowski deny the existence of the aether and of true time, and to see all reference systems as equally valid. Which of these two ways of thinking one is following, can surely be left to the individual.

Einstein and Minkowski [ Lorentz and general relativity[ edit ] Lorentz was one of few scientists who supported Einstein's search for general relativity from the beginning — he wrote several research papers and discussed with Einstein personally and by letter.

The enormous significance of his work consisted therein, that it forms the basis for the theory of atoms and for the general and special theories of relativity. The special theory was a more detailed expose of those concepts which are found in Lorentz's research of For me personally he meant more than all the others I have met on my life's journey. Look at the ease with which the new Zeeman phenomenon found its place, and even aided the classification of Faraday's magnetic rotation, which had defied all Maxwell's efforts.

Paul Langevin said of Lorentz: